Friday, October 30, 2009

How important are you to your Twitter followers?

Ever wonder how many people on Twitter would recommend you if given the chance? Now that Twitter lists are here I decided to find out.

I calculated "popularity" by dividing the number of lists an account was on by the number of followers it has. Those shown first have been placed on the most lists as a percentage of their total followers. (The two highlighted accounts are two of my Twitter accounts).

I tried to compare a variety of types of accounts, using the Twitalyzer 100 list and some well-known names in different industries as a source.

Account
Ratio
followers

lists
arrington
3.808%
16,808
640
ginatrapani
2.738%
28,124
770
Danny Sullivan
2.375%
21,092
501
davewiner
2.137%
25,920
554
parislemon
2.114%
12,533
265
scobleizer
1.886%
100,823
1,902
BrianSolis
1.660%
35,836
595
DrWayneWDyer
1.543%
31,812
491
chrisbrogan
1.348%
105,527
1,423
mayhemstudios
1.233%
36,727
453
GuyKawasaki
1.209%
186,794
2,258
shitmydadsays
1.019%
646,791
6,589
cheth
0.928%
29,425
273
 jason_pollock
0.789%
66,398
524
buzzedition
0.786%
44,936
353
alyssa_milano
0.775%
316,048
2,448
Twitter_Tips
0.661%
141,731
937
StephenFry
0.527%
921,469
4,857
Classical_Music
0.463%
9,723
45
revrunwisdom
0.432%
411,161
1,775
zaibatsu
0.427%
99,679
426
Mashable
0.357%
1,677,784
5,982
BarackObama
0.336%
2,549,802
8,574
techcrunch
0.289%
1,102,277
3,185
google
0.270%
1,824,938
4,935
perezhilton
0.257%
1,582,109
4,073
wilw
0.236%
1,436,010
3,394
KevinRose
0.231%
1,165,038
2,692
nytimes
0.200%
2,038,344
4,073
CreativityBoost
0.195%
19,468
38
LaughItUp
0.168%
33,899
57
the_real_shaq
0.164%
2,479,829
4,060
britneyspears
0.150%
3,658,780
5,505
ev
0.146%
1,176,533
1,719
aplusk
0.143%
3,906,386
5,603
GaryVee
0.125%
851,109
1,068
iamdiddy
0.104%
2,188,900
2,278
Sween
0.089%
1,028,063
911
biz
0.082%
1,454,232
1,194
jack
0.057%
1,407,798
797

What's YOUR Twitter ratio?


Read more!

Monday, September 28, 2009

Twitter is just stupid, pointless hype?

So many clueless people, so little time... Recently,  Patrick Kershaw wrote an article about the valuelessness of Twitter. An excerpt:

"Consider Twitter…I am unable to see the benefit on even a personal level. I am not a celebrity-watcher, nor do I care what others are doing every minute of their lives. So is any value added at all? I don't think so.…If you cannot see a benefit, don't follow the hype."
Too many journalists have been doing no research on how Twitter is actually used

While Patrick (not a journalist) also made some points about how he feels social networks can be used, many journalists don't even bother. They just direct withering criticism at people who use a communications medium to tell others what they are doing.

Never mind that Twitter can be used to communicate anything; the fact that a few people use it in ways they think they never would means it must be worthless for everyone. Never mind actually researching what you are writing about and finding out what people are actually doing; stick to simple stereotypes.

A journalist's time saver: A pre-written article about pointless fads like Twitter

So in the interest of saving everyone time, I have created a template to assist busy journalists not interested in doing their own research. Simply copy the article below and publish it as your own writing:
Dear readers,

I, an important journalist, want to tell you that Twitter is just stupid, pointless hype because I heard that someone once used it to write what they were having for breakfast. I promise I will never use Twitter.

These things are so easy to spot for someone as smart as me. In fact, yesterday, I saw someone in the grocery store talking about cereal on their mobile phone! Anything you would use to talk about cereal is just hype. No phones for me.

I really can pick 'em, can't I? Someone told me the other day my articles are now being published on the internet. Do you realize the internet is full of pages of funny cat pictures? Another pointless, flash-in-the-pan medium.

It seems like there are a lot of stupid things that will be going away soon. My friend told me people sometimes get offensive messages from people they don't know by email. Clearly only morons use email.

Here's one that made me laugh: I saw someone in the park holding a stupid picture up to their face. Another moronic trend. Attached to the back were hundreds of pages with letters printed on them—all about that dumb picture! Books are unbelievably stupid.

And I can't believe you've overlooked the dumbest fad of all: Why haven't more people noticed—as I have—that other people are always saying stupid things? People are pointless.

That's why I live in a cave.

Communicating is just stupid, pointless hype.
The article beginning "Dear readers" is offered free of copyright under an Uncreative Morons license.


Read more!

Thursday, September 24, 2009

What are the most essential Twitter apps ever created?

OneForty looks like the best site yet to provide a categorized list of Twitter Apps.

While OneForty requires an invitation to join and so is not available to everyone yet, I wanted to provide what I think is one of it's most valuable features to the general user: a "best of" list of apps organized by category they call "essentials."

What do you think? Are these the  most essential Twitter apps out there? Here's their list as of late September, 2009:

Desktop
TweetDeck
Tweetie for Mac
Twitterrific
Seesmic Desktop
DestroyTwitter
Twhirl
Mobile
Tweetie
SimplyTweet
twidroid
UberTwitter
TwitterFon
Gravity
Business
CoTweet
HootSuite
TweetLater
PeopleBrowsr
Twitter
EasyTweets
Networking
Mr. Tweet
WeFollow
Who
Friend
Twitter
UnTweeps
Entertainment
Overheard.it
Twittervision
Twistori
Twitter
CelebritiesThatTwitter
Post Like A Pirate
Monitoring
Objective
TweetBeep
PeopleBrowsr
OneRiot
Collecta
Radian6
Media Sharing
TwitPic
Qik
Blip.fm
twt.fm
Screenr
yfrog
Link Tools
Bit.ly
Tweetmeme
Eventbox
twitterfeed
Backtweets
TwitThis
Analytics
TweetStats
Twitter
Twitalyzer
TweetVolume
Tweetrush
Follow Cost
Random
Peekr
Post Like A Pirate
Flip
Portwiture
pici.me
Oh My Science


Read more!

Thursday, September 10, 2009

How Twitter messages work when you use @

First, imagine a fictional family where everyone follows each other on Twitter: @Mom, @Dad, @Brother and @Sister.
1. The basics
Rule #1: A person must follow you before you can DM them. If @Mom and @Dad (fictional example names) want to write completely privately so no one will see what they write but each other, they have to DM each other.
Rule #2: Anytime you put an @someone anywhere in a tweet, it will be sent to that @someone, regardless of whether they follow you or not.


Read more …


Read more!